Fish Passage Case Studies

Dry Creek
Low-Water Crossing with Concrete Planks

Case Study Contributors

  • Jim Kozik, Road Operations Engineer
  • Larry Holsomback, District Engineer Technician Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest, US Forest Service

Location
Armuchee Creek Watershed, Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest, Georgia, USA

Project Type
Low-water crossing retrofitted with precast concrete boat-ramp planks

Pre-Project Conditions

  • Low-water crossing
  • Drivers widened crossing approaches as the crossing roadbed degraded and water depths increased
  • Chronic erosion of crossing approaches and banks delivered sediment to stream

Pre-Project Barriers
None

Watershed Characteristics

  • Drainage Area: 35 mi2 (90.5 km2)
  • Bankfull Width: 60 ft (18 m)

Ecological Value
Reduction of sediment inputs and while maintaining access to upstream habitat for many fish species, including redeye bass, Coosa darter, Alabama rainbow, which carry freshwater mussels.

Project Characteristics

  • Rebuild wet ford crossing using 6 in (15 cm) thick precast concrete planks
  • Crossing dimensions: 90 ft (27 m) long x 14 ft (4.3 m) wide
  • Planks underlain with geo-fabric and filled voids between planks with small stone
  • Approaches at 8% grade and armored with quarried rock
  • Buttress downstream edge of crossing with concrete median barrier laid on side

Challenges

  • Channel scour and down-cutting below crossing created 10 in (25 cm) drop onto concrete median barriers during low-flow
  • Rock weir was placed downstream to reduce scour and improve low-flow fish passage.
  • Construction in a live stream was difficult due to water velocities
  • Entrenched streambanks and moderately erosive soils
  • Transporting planks and median barriers on low-standard forest road was difficult
  • Placement of heavy concrete median blocks challenging

Project Contributor
US Forest Service

Project Funding
US Forest Service

Completion Date
1994

Total Project Cost

Materials $ 12,000
Construction $ 3,000

Total $ 15,000


Project Summary

Erosion from the approaches of the low-water crossing was a source of chronic sediment delivery to the stream. Drivers were widening the approaches as the roadbed in the stream became deeper. To stabilize the crossing and reduce erosion, a concrete plank low-water crossing with rocked approaches was constructed.

The crossing design was based on an article published in US Forest Service Engineering Field Notes and local experience. Six inch (15 cm) thick precast concrete planks, designed for use with boat ramps, were placed across the channel to provide a stable driving surface. Planks were placed on geotextile fabric and additional planks were placed on their side to form a curb and keep traffic on the roadbed. Concrete median barriers laid on their sides were used as a buttress along the downstream edge of the crossing.

This project was the second in a series of low-water crossings within the watershed. The first utilized a plastic geo-cell membrane filled with gravel and the newest utilized linked concrete blocks.


Post Project Performance

The crossing, with some modifications, has performed fairly well for over a decade. After construction downstream channel scour and down-cutting created a 10 in (25 cm) drop onto the face of the concrete median barrier. Also, stream velocity between adjacent planks may have created a velocity barrier to upstream fish movement during low-flow conditions. A downstream rock weir was constructed to protect the crossing from scour, which backwaters the crossing and improves passage conditions over the planks. However, the hydraulic conditions created by the rock weir may hinder low-flow passage of weaker swimming fish species.

Portions of the geotextile fabric have come loose and needs to be rebedded and the approaches could use additional stone.


Lessons Learned

Construction, including placement of the geo-fabric and planks, is difficult in a live stream due to water velocity. Concrete planks and median barriers were very heavy and difficult to handle and transport. Elevation of concrete planks should have been slightly lower and the upstream edge of geotextile should have been embedded lower into the streambed.

Higher water velocities over the planks tend to scour the channel along the downstream edge of the crossing, forming a small drop and exposing the face of the concrete median barriers. Use of this low-water crossing design may need to include addition of a low-profile downstream rock weir to prevent fish passage and structural issues caused by scour.


Published 03/25/08