|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUNDAY
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
RECEPTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORIENTATION/KEYNOTE
LECTURE
|
|
8.00
|
|
Strauss
|
|
WELCOME TO
CONFERENCE, SCIENTIFIC NOTES
|
|
8.10
|
|
Cloughesy
|
|
LOGISTICS
|
|
8.20
|
|
Bradshaw
|
|
KEYNOTE INTRODUCTION
|
|
8.30
|
|
Keynote - Salwasser
|
|
FUTURE FORESTS: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONTEXTS FOR FOREST BIOTECHNOLOGIES
|
|
9.15
|
|
RECEPTION
CONTINUES
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
END RECEPTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MONDAY
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Strauss
|
|
INTRO
|
|
8.05
|
|
Risser, OSU
President
|
|
WELCOME
|
|
8.15
|
|
Strauss
|
|
SYMPOSIUM GOALS
|
|
8.25
|
|
Clegg/Salwasser
|
|
MODERATORS
COMMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POLICY &
ECONOMICS
|
|
8.30
|
|
Sedjo
|
|
ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION
OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND FOREST PLANTATIONS IN GLOBAL WOOD SUPPLY AND
FOREST CONSERVATION
|
|
8.55
|
|
Victor
|
|
PLANTATIONS
AND FOREST PROTECTION: A LONG-TERM, GLOBAL VIEW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS
|
|
9.20
|
|
Lucier/McCullough/Hinchee
|
|
FOREST BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE FOREST PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
|
|
9.45
|
|
Burke/IFB
|
|
GROWING NEW
QUESTIONS: THE SOCIETAL AND ETHICAL IMPERATIVES OF FOREST BIOTECHNOLOGY,
AND THE ROLE OF THE INSTITUTE OF FOREST BIOTECHNOLOGY
|
|
10.10
|
|
BREAK
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Doering
|
|
WILL THE MARKETPLACE
SEE THE SUSTAINABLE FOREST FOR THE TRANSGENIC TREES?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETHICS
|
|
10.55
|
|
Thompson
|
|
ETHICS OF MOLECULAR
SILVICULTURE
|
|
11.20
|
|
Thomas
|
|
ETHICAL AND
SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN COMMERCIAL USES OF TRANSGENIC FOOD AND
FIBER CROPS
|
|
11.45
|
|
LUNCH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REGULATORY
|
|
1.00
|
|
Kough / Heron
|
|
CURRENT AND
EVOLVING REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL USES OF TRANSGENIC
CROPS AND TREES IN THE USA
|
|
1.25
|
|
Mayer
|
|
INTERNATIONAL
REGULATION AND PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF GM TREES: DEMANDING A NEW APPROACH
TO RISK ASSESSMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORESTRY
SCIENCE
|
|
1.50
|
|
Ellis/Meilan
|
|
TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY
OF GENETIC ENGINEERING IN FORESTRY: TRANSFORMATION, TRANSGENE STABILITY,
STERILITY, AND SOMACLONAL VARIATION.
|
|
2.15
|
|
Burdon/Walter
|
|
PERSPECTIVES
ON RISK OF TRANSGENIC FOREST PLANTATIONS IN RELATION TO CONVENTIONAL
BREEDING AND USE OF EXOTIC PINES AND EUCALYPTS: VIEWPOINTS OF PRACTICING
BREEDING AND TRANSFORMATION SCIENTISTS.
|
|
2.40
|
|
Raffa
|
|
USE OF TRANSGENIC
RESISTANCE IN SHORT-ROTATION POPLARS: EFFICACY, RISK, AND INTEGRATION
WITH OTHER PEST MANAGEMENT TACTICS
|
|
3.05
|
|
BREAK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECOLOGICAL
SCIENCE
|
|
3.30
|
|
Boyle/Lundkvist/Smith
|
|
ECOLOGICAL
AND LANDSCAPE CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTENSIVE FORESTRY SYSTEMS
|
|
3.55
|
|
Campbell
|
|
GENETICALLY
ENGINEERED TREES: PROCEED ONLY WITH CAUTION
|
|
4.20
|
|
Hayes
|
|
BIODIVERSITY
IMPLICATIONS OF TRANSGENIC PLANTATIONS
|
|
4.45
|
|
Johnson/Kirby
|
|
POTENTIAL EFFECTS
OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED TREES ON BIODIVERSITY OF FOREST PLANTATIONS:
A GLOBAL VIEW
|
|
5.10
|
|
Hancock/Hokanson
|
|
INVASIVENESS
OF TRANSGENIC VS. EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES: HOW USEFUL IS THE ANALOGY?
|
|
5.35
|
|
Strauss / Bradshaw
|
|
RECAP &
CLARIFICATION OF KEY POINTS AND CONTEXT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMING
UP
|
|
6.00
|
|
Clegg/Salwasser
|
|
AREAS OF CONSENSUS
AND DISAGREEMENT, NEW ISSUES, BREAKOUT INSTRUCTIONS
|
|
6.30
|
|
DINNER:
SALMON AND CRUISE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TUESDAY
|
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
BREAKOUTS
1-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-SOCIAL/GLOBAL
CONTEXT
|
|
|
|
|
|
2-BIOLOGICAL
CONTEXT / BIODIVERSITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-FERTILITY
REDUCTION / INVASIVENESS
|
|
|
|
|
|
4-WOOD
DOMESTICATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-BENEFIT/SAFETY
OF PEST MANAGEMENT APPLICS
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
BREAKOUTS
1-5 (REPLICATE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-SOCIAL/GLOBAL
CONTEXT
|
|
|
|
|
|
2-BIOLOGICAL
CONTEXT / BIODIVERSITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-FERTILITY
REDUCTION / INVASIVENESS
|
|
|
|
|
|
4-WOOD
DOMESTICATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-BENEFIT/SAFETY
OF PEST MANAGEMENT APPLICS
|
|
10.00
|
|
BREAK
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
REPORTS FROM
GROUPS
& DISCUSSION
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
LUNCH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY
VIEWS
|
|
1.00
|
|
Thompson/Sedjo
|
|
POLICY/ETHICS
|
|
1.10
|
|
McCullough/Carraway
|
|
INDUSTRY
|
|
1.20
|
|
Botkin/Raffa
|
|
ECOLOGICAL
SCIENCE
|
|
1.30
|
|
Bradshaw/Strauss
|
|
BIOTECHNOLOGY/GENETICS;
CONSENSUS BIOTECHNOLOGY STATEMENT
|
|
1.45
|
|
Mayer/Campbell
|
|
NGO/ENVIRONMENTAL;
CONSENSUS ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
|
|
2.00
|
|
Clegg/Salwasser
|
|
MODERATOR PERSPECTIVES,
SYNTHESIS STATEMENT
|
|
2.15
|
|
SURVEY
|
|
TIME TO FILL
OUT WRITTEN SURVEYS
|
|
2.30
|
|
END MEETING / BREAK
|
|
STRAUSS
|